Project at a Glance
- Stage: Concept validation (no launch)
- Domain: Wellness for diaspora users
- My role: Solo UX Researcher & Strategist
- Methods: 8 interviews · 56-response survey · ecosystem scan · light usability
- Participants: Diaspora users (25–50) across US/EU/ME
- Focus: Trust, tone, language, cultural alignment
- Outcome: Paused premature build; reshaped tone/onboarding; defined semantic tags for future matching/personalization
voice-anchored snapshot
Cultural Seeker “someone like me”
- Warm tone; native-language cues build early trust
- Generic/“cold” apps feel distant and formal
- Needs soft, human onboarding (low-pressure start)
Interview P03 — Cultural Seeker, 32, Berlin
Oriented Planner “show me the plan”
- Clear structure, milestones, and accountability matter most
- Wants culturally aware interaction (not western-centric visuals)
- Expects progress tracking across time zones
Interview P07 — Oriented Planner, 29, Toronto
Skeptical Drop-Off “invite me in”
- Quick to disengage if tone feels corporate or “perfect”
- Prefers informal, peer-like interface and language
- Needs a low-pressure first step to try, then commit
Usability T02 — Skeptical Drop-Off, 34, London
Approach — Research Journey
Emotional Discovery
Interviews with diaspora users to surface motivators, trust signals, and cultural friction. Patterns like “someone like me” and “from my roots” guided tone and onboarding.
Ecosystem Benchmarking
Scan of 10+ platforms showed polished but “cold” UX. We identified whitespace for trust-first, culturally grounded positioning.
Quantitative Validation
A short survey confirmed the hierarchy of needs: trust, tone, and language familiarity ranked above features.
Key Insights
1
Users wanted someone like them , relatability beat credentials.
2
Language + warm tone built early trust more than features did.
3
Over-polished, “cold” visuals triggered early drop-off.
4
Generic messaging failed; human, local stories worked.
5
We turned insights into simple tags (tone, trust cue, cultural match) to support future personalization.
Survey Highlights (N=56)
A light validation layer to rank what mattered most. These results informed tone and onboarding priorities—without claiming post-launch impact.
82%
- rated trainer trust “very important”
76%
- rated native language & tone “very important”
65%
- reported cold, generic platforms as a barrier
Self-reported importance. Used to prioritize tone/onboarding, not post-launch metrics.
Whitespace: trust-first, culturally grounded onboarding.
Where FitLoom Differed
Mainstream
“Cold-Polish”
- Generic tone; low cultural alignment
- English-first content and UX
- Credentials over relatability
- Formal onboarding; little warmth
FitLoom
Trust-First
- Warm, community-like tone
- Native-language cues throughout
- Relatable coach stories and backgrounds
- Soft, human onboarding
Usability
&
Risk Notes
- Tone comprehension: “studio-perfect” visuals felt distant warmer microcopy + human imagery.
- Language cues: Native-language labels reduced hesitation on first tap.
- Payment/coordination risk: Flagged for design guardrails; mapped to semantic tags.
- Bias watch-outs: Avoid over-indexing on Western aesthetics in content/images.
From Research to Personalization
Impact on Decisions
Paused launch
Avoided building on assumptions
Onboarding tone
Warm, culturally familiar microcopy
Voice-anchored personas
Clearer scope & GTM story
Semantic tags
Future matching & personalization



